This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0289
Case C-289/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 9 April 2019 — Dexia Nederland BV v Z
Case C-289/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 9 April 2019 — Dexia Nederland BV v Z
Case C-289/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 9 April 2019 — Dexia Nederland BV v Z
OJ C 280, 19.8.2019, p. 18–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.8.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 280/18 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 9 April 2019 — Dexia Nederland BV v Z
(Case C-289/19)
(2019/C 280/25)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Gerechtshof Den Haag
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Dexia Nederland BV
Respondent: Z
Questions referred
1. |
Can the user of an unfair term relating to the payment of compensation in the event of a consumer’s non-compliance with his obligations, which has been declared void, claim the legal compensation provided for by way of supplementary law? |
2. |
For the purpose of answering that question, does it matter whether the compensation that can be claimed by the application of the statutory compensation scheme is equal to or lower or higher than the compensation under the term which has been declared void? |