EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0585
Case T-585/18: Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council
Case T-585/18: Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council
Case T-585/18: Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council
OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 59–59
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
3.12.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 436/59 |
Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council
(Case T-585/18)
(2018/C 436/82)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Dalokay Şanli (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Gürses, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the Council of 31 July 2018; |
— |
remove the applicant from the list referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, and |
— |
order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
1. |
First plea in law, alleging breach of essential formal requirements and infringement of the Treaties. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that there has been no evidence submitted in the proceedings proving that the applicant has carried out terrorist act. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant was unable to defend himself adequately in the procedure that led to the contested decision. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the decision is inadequately reasoned. |
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging that the decision was adopted in infringement of the principles of subsidiarity and of proportionality. |
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging that Regulation No 2580/2001 is not applicable given that the PKK is not a terrorist organisation. |
7. |
Seventh plea in law, alleging that the adopted decision is contrary to the principle of proportionality. |