Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62018TN0585

Case T-585/18: Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council

OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 59–59 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

3.12.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/59

Action brought on 27 September 2018 — Şanli v Council

(Case T-585/18)

(2018/C 436/82)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Dalokay Şanli (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Gürses, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

—

annul the decision of the Council of 31 July 2018;

—

remove the applicant from the list referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, and

—

order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

1.

First plea in law, alleging breach of essential formal requirements and infringement of the Treaties.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that there has been no evidence submitted in the proceedings proving that the applicant has carried out terrorist act.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant was unable to defend himself adequately in the procedure that led to the contested decision.

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the decision is inadequately reasoned.

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging that the decision was adopted in infringement of the principles of subsidiarity and of proportionality.

6.

Sixth plea in law, alleging that Regulation No 2580/2001 is not applicable given that the PKK is not a terrorist organisation.

7.

Seventh plea in law, alleging that the adopted decision is contrary to the principle of proportionality.
Top