Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CN0638

    Case C-638/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 15 November 2017 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

    OJ C 52, 12.2.2018, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.2.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 52/16


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 15 November 2017 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

    (Case C-638/17)

    (2018/C 052/22)

    Language of the case: Lithuanian

    Referring court

    Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

    Other party:‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

    Questions referred

    Must Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/64/EU (1) of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codification) be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘cigars or cigarillos’ covers (or does not cover) cases where part of the wrapper of natural or reconstituted tobacco is additionally covered by another outer (paper) layer, as in the case at issue? Is it relevant to the answer to that question that the use of paper as an additional layer in the outer wrapper of the tobacco product (where the filter is) means that it is visually similar to a cigarette?


    (1)  OJ 2011 L 176, p. 24.


    Top