Case C-519/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2016 — Trafilerie Meridionali SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Fines — Setting of the fines — 2006 Guidelines for the setting of fines — Point 35 — Unlimited jurisdiction — Obligation to state reasons — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy within a reasonable time)

Case C-519/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2016 — Trafilerie Meridionali SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Fines — Setting of the fines — 2006 Guidelines for the setting of fines — Point 35 — Unlimited jurisdiction — Obligation to state reasons — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy within a reasonable time)

Case C-519/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2016 — Trafilerie Meridionali SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Fines — Setting of the fines — 2006 Guidelines for the setting of fines — Point 35 — Unlimited jurisdiction — Obligation to state reasons — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy within a reasonable time)

OJ C 419, 14.11.2016, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)