Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CA0095

    Case C-95/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2017 — H&R ChemPharm GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for paraffin wax and the German market for slack wax — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the evidence — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(3) — Calculation of the amount of the fine — The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Principle of proportionality)

    OJ C 112, 10.4.2017, p. 5–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.4.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 112/5


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2017 — H&R ChemPharm GmbH v European Commission

    (Case C-95/15 P) (1)

    ((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for paraffin wax and the German market for slack wax - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the evidence - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(3) - Calculation of the amount of the fine - The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Principle of proportionality))

    (2017/C 112/07)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Appellant: H&R ChemPharm GmbH (represented by: M. Klusmann, lawyer and S. Thomas, Professor)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Sauer, C. Vollrath and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents, and by A. Böhlke, lawyer)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dimsisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders H&R ChemPharm GmbH to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.


    Top