Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CA0011

    Case C-11/15: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Odvolací finanční ředitelství v Český rozhlas (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sixth Directive 77/388/EC — Value added tax — Article 2(1) — Supply of services effected for consideration — Definition — Public broadcasting — Financing from a compulsory statutory fee)

    OJ C 314, 29.8.2016, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.8.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 314/3


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Odvolací finanční ředitelství v Český rozhlas

    (Case C-11/15) (1)

    ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Sixth Directive 77/388/EC - Value added tax - Article 2(1) - Supply of services effected for consideration - Definition - Public broadcasting - Financing from a compulsory statutory fee))

    (2016/C 314/04)

    Language of the case: Czech

    Referring court

    Nejvyšší správní soud

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

    Defendant: Český rozhlas

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 2(1) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that public broadcasting activities, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, funded by a compulsory statutory charge paid by owners or possessors of a radio receiver and carried out by a radio broadcasting company created by law, do not constitute a supply of services ‘effected for consideration’ within the meaning of that provision and therefore fall outside the scope of that directive.


    (1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.


    Top