This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0190
Case T-190/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg v Commission
Case T-190/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg v Commission
Case T-190/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg v Commission
OJ C 156, 1.6.2013, p. 49–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
1.6.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 156/49 |
Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg v Commission
(Case T-190/13)
2013/C 156/91
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg (Leidschendam-Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: A. de Groot and J.J.M. Sluijs, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
— |
Annul the contested decision; and |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant challenges Commission Decision C(2013) 87 of 23 January 2013 on State aid SA.24123 (2012/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by the Netherlands — Alleged sale of land below market price by the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging breach of essential procedural requirements and/or of the obligation to state reasons.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging misapplication of Article 107(1) TFEU.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, concerning Article 107(3) TFEU. Should the Municipality be found to have granted aid, this should be regarded as being compatible with Article 107(3) TFEU. |