EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CN0151
Case C-151/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 28 March 2011 — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel
Case C-151/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 28 March 2011 — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel
Case C-151/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 28 March 2011 — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel
OJ C 204, 9.7.2011, p. 12–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.7.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 204/12 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 28 March 2011 — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel
(Case C-151/11)
2011/C 204/23
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landgericht Frankfurt am Main
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH
Defendant: Jürgen Dörschel
Questions referred
1. |
Does a passenger have a right to payment of compensation under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) in the case where the flight, following its departure according to schedule, is discontinued and the aircraft, before arriving at the airport of destination, returns to the airport of departure and subsequently takes off again with a delay which is relevant for payment of compensation? |
2. |
Is there a discontinuance in the case where, after the aircraft doors have been closed, the journey is not continued? From what point is there a discontinuance of the start, rather than a delayed start? |
(1) Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.