This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CN0364
Case C-364/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon (Belgium) lodged on 7 August 2008 — Marc Vandermeir v État Belge — SPF Finances
Case C-364/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon (Belgium) lodged on 7 August 2008 — Marc Vandermeir v État Belge — SPF Finances
Case C-364/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon (Belgium) lodged on 7 August 2008 — Marc Vandermeir v État Belge — SPF Finances
OJ C 260, 11.10.2008, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.10.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 260/11 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon (Belgium) lodged on 7 August 2008 — Marc Vandermeir v État Belge — SPF Finances
(Case C-364/08)
(2008/C 260/20)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Marc Vandermeir
Defendant: État Belge — SPF Finances
Question referred
Do Articles 43 and/or 49 EC preclude national legislation of one Member State, such as the legislation in question, which requires a self-employed person residing in that Member State to register his vehicle there, although he carries on business almost exclusively in a second Member State from a fixed establishment that he owns there, and the vehicle is neither intended to be substantially used in the first Member State on a permanent basis, nor is in fact so used?