This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FB0085
Case F-85/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 February 2008 — Anselmo v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Grading — Successful candidates in an internal competition — New evidence — Lack — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-85/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 February 2008 — Anselmo v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Grading — Successful candidates in an internal competition — New evidence — Lack — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-85/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 February 2008 — Anselmo v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Grading — Successful candidates in an internal competition — New evidence — Lack — Manifestly inadmissible)
OJ C 92, 12.4.2008, p. 48–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.4.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 92/48 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 February 2008 — Anselmo v Council
(Case F-85/07) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Appointment - Grading - Successful candidates in an internal competition - New evidence - Lack - Manifestly inadmissible)
(2008/C 92/96)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Anselmo (Brussels, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Re:
Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority rejecting the complaints introduced by the applicants, successful candidates in internal competition B/277, because of discrimination which they maintain that they suffered in comparison with officials who benefited from the attestation procedure.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Each party is ordered to pay its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 269, 10.11.2007, p. 71.