This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FA0039
Case F-39/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Campos Valls v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Post of Head of Unit — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Conditions required for the notice of vacancy — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-39/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Campos Valls v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Post of Head of Unit — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Conditions required for the notice of vacancy — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-39/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Campos Valls v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Post of Head of Unit — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Conditions required for the notice of vacancy — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 193, 15.8.2009, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.8.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 193/34 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Campos Valls v Council
(Case F-39/07) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Appointment - Post of Head of Unit - Rejection of the applicant’s candidature - Conditions required for the notice of vacancy - Manifest error of assessment)
2009/C 193/55
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Manuel Campos Valls (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Šulce, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority to reject the applicant’s candidature for the post of head of the Spanish Language Unit of DG A, Directorate 3 — Translation and Document Production — Language Service, referred to in Staff Note CP46/06 and, second, of the decision to appoint another candidate to that post.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 129, 9.6.2007, p. 28.