Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0016

    Case T-16/17: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — APF v Parliament (Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political party — Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded — Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee — Financial Regulation — Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Proportionality — Abuse of power)

    OJ C 301, 27.8.2018, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    27.8.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 301/29


    Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — APF v Parliament

    (Case T-16/17) (1)

    ((Institutional law - European Parliament - Decision awarding a grant to a political party - Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded - Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee - Financial Regulation - Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding - Proportionality - Abuse of power))

    (2018/C 301/37)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Alliance for Peace and Freedom (APF) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Decision FINS-2017-15 of the European Parliament of 12 December 2016 concerning the award of a grant to the applicant, in so far as that decision restricts the pre-financing to 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant and makes its payment subject to the provision of a bank guarantee.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Alliance for Peace and Freedom (APF) to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.


    Top