Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TA0365

    Case T-365/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Portigon v SRB (Economic and Monetary Union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on the 2016 ex-ante contributions — Action for annulment — Direct and individual concern — Admissibility — Essential procedural requirements — Authentication of the decision — Procedure for the adoption of the decision — Obligation to state reasons)

    OJ C 36, 3.2.2020, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.2.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 36/22


    Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Portigon v SRB

    (Case T-365/16) (1)

    (Economic and Monetary Union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the 2016 ex-ante contributions - Action for annulment - Direct and individual concern - Admissibility - Essential procedural requirements - Authentication of the decision - Procedure for the adoption of the decision - Obligation to state reasons)

    (2020/C 36/26)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Portigon AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: D. Bliesener, V. Jungkind and F. Geber, lawyers)

    Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: B. Meyring, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

    Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and K.-P. Wojcik, Agents)

    Re:

    Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and, second, of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, supplementing the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), to the extent that they concern the applicant.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    annuls the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, supplementing the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), to the extent that they concern Portigon AG;

    2.

    orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Portigon;

    3.

    orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.


    Top