Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TN0723

Case T-723/22: Action brought on 15 November 2022 — Sonasurf Internacional and Others v Commission

OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 62–63 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

23.1.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/62


Action brought on 15 November 2022 — Sonasurf Internacional and Others v Commission

(Case T-723/22)

(2023/C 24/86)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicants: Sonasurf Internacional — Shipping Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal), Mastshipping — Shipping, Sociedade Unipessoal Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal), Latin Quarter — Serviços Marítimos Internacionais Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal) (represented by: R. Bordalo Junqueiro, S. Fernandes de Almeida, R. F. Costa and P. G. Marques, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

recognise the applicants’ legitimate interest in bringing the present action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU;

declare that the present action for annulment has been brought in due form and is admissible under Article 263 TFEU;

annul the contested decision pursuant to Article 264 TFEU;

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings together with the expenses incurred by the applicants.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action against Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (notified under document C(2020) 8550) (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49), the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-718/22, Eutelsat Madeira v Commission.


Top