This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0723
Case T-723/22: Action brought on 15 November 2022 — Sonasurf Internacional and Others v Commission
Case T-723/22: Action brought on 15 November 2022 — Sonasurf Internacional and Others v Commission
Case T-723/22: Action brought on 15 November 2022 — Sonasurf Internacional and Others v Commission
OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 62–63
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
23.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/62 |
Action brought on 15 November 2022 — Sonasurf Internacional and Others v Commission
(Case T-723/22)
(2023/C 24/86)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicants: Sonasurf Internacional — Shipping Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal), Mastshipping — Shipping, Sociedade Unipessoal Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal), Latin Quarter — Serviços Marítimos Internacionais Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal) (represented by: R. Bordalo Junqueiro, S. Fernandes de Almeida, R. F. Costa and P. G. Marques, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
— |
recognise the applicants’ legitimate interest in bringing the present action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU; |
— |
declare that the present action for annulment has been brought in due form and is admissible under Article 263 TFEU; |
— |
annul the contested decision pursuant to Article 264 TFEU; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings together with the expenses incurred by the applicants. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of their action against Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (notified under document C(2020) 8550) (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49), the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-718/22, Eutelsat Madeira v Commission.