Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022CN0217

    Case C-217/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 24 March 2022 — OV v Ministero Interno — Unità Dublino

    OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 222, 7.6.2022, p. 20–20 (GA)

    7.6.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 222/21

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 24 March 2022 — OV v Ministero Interno — Unità Dublino

    (Case C-217/22)

    (2022/C 222/31)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Tribunale ordinario di Bologna

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: OV

    Defendant: Ministero Interno — Unità Dublino

    Question referred

    1.

    Must Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, (1) particularly in view of the right to an effective remedy laid down in Article 27 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that the applicant, who has challenged before the courts of the requesting State the transfer decision adopted by the Dublin Unit of that State in the context of a take back procedure under Article 18(1)(b), is entitled to invoke the infringement by the requested State of the duty to provide information laid down in Article 4 or of the obligation to arrange a personal interview with the applicant under Article 5 of that regulation, and if the answer is in the affirmative, what is the relevance of such an infringement?

    (1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).

    Top