See dokument on väljavõte EUR-Lexi veebisaidilt.
Dokument 62022TN0672
Case T-672/22: Action brought on 7 November 2022 — López-Ibor Aliño v EUIPO — Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research (LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS)
Case T-672/22: Action brought on 7 November 2022 — López-Ibor Aliño v EUIPO — Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research (LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS)
Case T-672/22: Action brought on 7 November 2022 — López-Ibor Aliño v EUIPO — Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research (LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS)
OJ C 7, 9.1.2023, lk 41—42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 7/41 |
Action brought on 7 November 2022 — López-Ibor Aliño v EUIPO — Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research (LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS)
(Case T-672/22)
(2023/C 7/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Alfonso López-Ibor Aliño (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research, SL (Madrid)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS — Application No 18 190 205
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2022 in Case R 500/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
stay the present proceedings until a final judgment has been given in the revocation proceedings against the EU trade mark 009566291 ESTUDIO JURÍDICO INTERNACIONAL LÓPEZ-IBOR MAYOR & ASOCIADOS, proceedings, 000053919 C, before EUIPO; |
— |
uphold the action brought against the contested decision and allow the EU trade mark applied for, order the other party to pay the costs; |
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs and the other party in the event that that party appears in the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law
— |
Incorrect assessment of the proof of use in accordance with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |