This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0605
Case T-605/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — OY v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Article 3b of the CEOS — Recruitment — Classification in grade — Account taken of professional experience — General Implementing Provisions for Article 79(2) of the CEOS)
Case T-605/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — OY v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Article 3b of the CEOS — Recruitment — Classification in grade — Account taken of professional experience — General Implementing Provisions for Article 79(2) of the CEOS)
Case T-605/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — OY v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Article 3b of the CEOS — Recruitment — Classification in grade — Account taken of professional experience — General Implementing Provisions for Article 79(2) of the CEOS)
OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.12.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 436/37 |
Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2018 — OY v Commission
(Case T-605/16)
((Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Article 3b of the CEOS - Recruitment - Classification in grade - Account taken of professional experience - General Implementing Provisions for Article 79(2) of the CEOS))
(2018/C 436/51)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: OY (represented by: N. Flandin and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Commission of 2 October 2015 rejecting the applicant’s request for a review of her classification in function group IV, grade 15, step 1 and, second, in so far as necessary, annulment of the decision of the AECE of 29 March 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders OY to pay the costs. |