This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0577
Case T-577/17: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2018 — thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Authorisation for inward processing — Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers — Article 211(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Examination of the economic conditions — Scope of the Commission’s conclusions — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
Case T-577/17: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2018 — thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Authorisation for inward processing — Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers — Article 211(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Examination of the economic conditions — Scope of the Commission’s conclusions — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
Case T-577/17: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2018 — thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Authorisation for inward processing — Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers — Article 211(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Examination of the economic conditions — Scope of the Commission’s conclusions — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 301, 27.8.2018, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/34 |
Order of the General Court of 2 July 2018 — thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v Commission
(Case T-577/17) (1)
((Action for annulment - Customs union - Authorisation for inward processing - Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers - Article 211(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Examination of the economic conditions - Scope of the Commission’s conclusions - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))
(2018/C 301/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH (Gelsenkirchen, Germany) and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo (Isbergues, France) (represented by: M. Günes, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and F. Clotuche Duvieusart, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the Commission’s alleged decision ostensibly contained in the minutes of the sixth meeting of the Customs Expert Group Section ‘Special Procedures other than transit’ of 2 May 2017 concluding that the essential interests of EU producers would not be adversely affected by an authorisation for inward processing of certain grain-oriented electrical steel products requested by Euro-Mit Staal BV.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on Euro-Mit Staal BV’s application to intervene. |
|
3. |
In addition to bearing its own costs, the European Commission shall pay the costs incurred by thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo. |
|
4. |
Euro-Mit Staal BV shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. |