This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0097
Case T-97/17: Action brought on 16 February 2017 — Franmax v EUIPO — R. Seelig & Hille (her- bea)
Case T-97/17: Action brought on 16 February 2017 — Franmax v EUIPO — R. Seelig & Hille (her- bea)
Case T-97/17: Action brought on 16 February 2017 — Franmax v EUIPO — R. Seelig & Hille (her- bea)
OJ C 112, 10.4.2017, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 112/46 |
Action brought on 16 February 2017 — Franmax v EUIPO — R. Seelig & Hille (her- bea)
(Case T-97/17)
(2017/C 112/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Franmax UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: E. Saukalas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: R. Seelig & Hille OHG (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘her- bea’– Application for registration No 12 689 964
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 December 2016 in Case R 371/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |