EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0369
Case T-369/15: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Hernández Zamora v EUIPO — Rosen Tantau (Paloma) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Paloma — Earlier EU figurative mark Paloma — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-369/15: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Hernández Zamora v EUIPO — Rosen Tantau (Paloma) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Paloma — Earlier EU figurative mark Paloma — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-369/15: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Hernández Zamora v EUIPO — Rosen Tantau (Paloma) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Paloma — Earlier EU figurative mark Paloma — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 112, 10.4.2017, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 112/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Hernández Zamora v EUIPO — Rosen Tantau (Paloma)
(Case T-369/15) (1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Paloma - Earlier EU figurative mark Paloma - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 112/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hernández Zamora, SA (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo and I. Munilla Muños, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rosen Tantau KG (Uetersen, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2015 (Case R 1697/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hernández Zamora and Rosen Tantau.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hernández Zamora, SA to pay the costs. |