EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0384
Case C-384/16 P: Appeal brought on 11 July 2016 by European Union Copper Task Force against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 27 April 2016 in Case T-310/15: European Union Copper Task Force v European Commission
Case C-384/16 P: Appeal brought on 11 July 2016 by European Union Copper Task Force against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 27 April 2016 in Case T-310/15: European Union Copper Task Force v European Commission
Case C-384/16 P: Appeal brought on 11 July 2016 by European Union Copper Task Force against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 27 April 2016 in Case T-310/15: European Union Copper Task Force v European Commission
OJ C 314, 29.8.2016, p. 15–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.8.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 314/15 |
Appeal brought on 11 July 2016 by European Union Copper Task Force against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 27 April 2016 in Case T-310/15: European Union Copper Task Force v European Commission
(Case C-384/16 P)
(2016/C 314/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: European Union Copper Task Force (represented by: C. Fernández Vicién, I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas, C. Vila Gisbert, abogadas)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul the Order of the Third Chamber of the General Court of the European Union of 27 April 2016 in Case T-310/15, European Union Copper Task Force v. European Commission. |
|
— |
Declare the admissibility of the action for annulment lodged by the European Copper Task Force against the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408. |
|
— |
Refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union for judgment. |
|
— |
Order the European Commission to pay the costs generated by these proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
|
1. |
The General Court committed an error of law by considering that Implementing Regulation 2015/408 (1) is a regulatory act that entails implementing measures within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU. |
|
2. |
The General Court committed an error of law by considering that the dismissal of the EUCuTF’s action would not impair its right and its members’ right to effective judicial protection. |
|
3. |
The General Court committed an error of law by considering that the EUCuTF and its members were not individually affected by Implementing Regulation 2015/408. |
(1) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution. OJ L 67, p. 18