This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0297
Case T-297/15 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2015 by Ángel Coedo Suárez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-38/14, Coedo Suárez v Council
Case T-297/15 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2015 by Ángel Coedo Suárez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-38/14, Coedo Suárez v Council
Case T-297/15 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2015 by Ángel Coedo Suárez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-38/14, Coedo Suárez v Council
OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.7.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 245/44 |
Appeal brought on 8 June 2015 by Ángel Coedo Suárez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-38/14, Coedo Suárez v Council
(Case T-297/15 P)
(2015/C 245/53)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
— |
declare the present appeal admissible; |
— |
set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14, EU:F:2015:25); |
— |
grant the application for annulment made by the appellant at first instance; |
— |
order the Council to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a distortion of the facts and evidence, and an error of law, in that the Civil Service Tribunal held that the appointing authority had not committed a manifest error of assessment in finding that the appellant’s ill health did not constitute an extenuating circumstance. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons. |