Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0027

    Case T-27/14: Action brought on 10 January 2014 — Czech Republic v Commission

    OJ C 85, 22.3.2014, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.3.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 85/22

    Action brought on 10 January 2014 — Czech Republic v Commission

    (Case T-27/14)

    2014/C 85/38

    Language of the case: Czech

    Parties

    Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil and T. Müller, Agents)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul the European Commission’s call C(2013)7221 final of 4 November 2013 for the withdrawal of the decision of the Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu České republiky (Czech Ministry of Trade and Industry), which grants a derogation to the gas storage facilities in Dambořice from the national legislation implementing the provisions of Directive 2003/55/EC (1) on the rules for the access of third parties and

    —

    Order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 266(1) TFEU

    —

    In this connection, the applicant submits that the Commission, by the adoption of the contested decision, proceeded in a manner directly contrary to the judgment in Case T-465/11 Globula v Commission [2013] ECR.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 22(4) of Directive 2003/55/EC

    —

    In this plea, the applicant submits that the Commission adopted the contested decision after the expiry of the time-limit set in Article 22(4) of Directive 2003/55/EC.

    (1)  Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 57).

    Top