Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CN0454

    Case C-454/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 13 August 2013 — Belgacom SA v Commune d’Etterbeek

    OJ C 313, 26.10.2013, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    26.10.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 313/13


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 13 August 2013 — Belgacom SA v Commune d’Etterbeek

    (Case C-454/13)

    2013/C 313/22

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Belgacom SA

    Defendant: Commune d’Etterbeek

    Question referred

    Must Articles 12 and 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (‘Authorisation Directive’) (1) be interpreted as precluding the introduction, for budgetary purposes, by legislation of a national or local authority, of a tax on mobile communications infrastructures, installed on public or private property, used to carry on activities provided for in the general authorisation?


    (1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21.


    Top