Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TA0161

    Case T-161/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark E-PLEX — Earlier national word mark EPILEX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    OJ C 204, 9.7.2011, p. 22–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.7.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 204/22


    Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX)

    (Case T-161/10) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark E-PLEX - Earlier national word mark EPILEX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    2011/C 204/40

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 February 2010 (Case R 662/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA and Longevity Health Products, Inc.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.


    Top