This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0207
Case T-207/11: Action brought on 8 April 2011 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
Case T-207/11: Action brought on 8 April 2011 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
Case T-207/11: Action brought on 8 April 2011 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
OJ C 194, 2.7.2011, p. 15–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 08/04/2011
- Date lodged:
- 08/04/2011
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
2.7.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 194/15 |
Action brought on 8 April 2011 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
(Case T-207/11)
2011/C 194/23
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: EyeSense AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Aicher, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Osypka Medical GmbH (Berlin, Germany)
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the order of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2011 in Appeal R 1098/2010-4; |
|
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal proceedings before OHIM. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Osypka Medical.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ISENSE’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 10 and 42 — Registration No 7 165 327.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘EyeSense’ for goods and services in Classes 10 and 42.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) as there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
