Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TN0366

    Case T-366/18: Action brought on 8 June 2018 — Pet King Brands v EUIPO — Virbac (SUIMOX)

    OJ C 276, 6.8.2018, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201807201082013392018/C 276/863662018TC27620180806EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180608555511

    Case T-366/18: Action brought on 8 June 2018 — Pet King Brands v EUIPO — Virbac (SUIMOX)

    Top

    C2762018EN5510120180608EN0086551551

    Action brought on 8 June 2018 — Pet King Brands v EUIPO — Virbac (SUIMOX)

    (Case T-366/18)

    2018/C 276/86Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Pet King Brands, Inc. (Bartlett, Illinois, United States) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Virbac SA (Carros, France)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SUIMOX — Application for registration No 15 039 993

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2018 in Case R 1835/2017-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    Top