Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015CN0639

    Case C-639/15 P: Appeal brought on 1 December 2015 by Gat Microencapsulation GmbH (anciennement Gat Microencapsulation AG) against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 30 September 2015 in Case T-720/13: Gat Microencapsulation v EUIPO

    OJ C 314, 29.8.2016, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    01/12/2015
    Date lodged:
    01/12/2015
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Appeal - inadmissible, Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    29.8.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 314/8

    Appeal brought on 1 December 2015 by Gat Microencapsulation GmbH (anciennement Gat Microencapsulation AG) against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 30 September 2015 in Case T-720/13: Gat Microencapsulation v EUIPO

    (Case C-639/15 P)

    (2016/C 314/12)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Gat Microencapsulation GmbH (anciennement Gat Microencapsulation AG) (represented by: S. Soler Lerma, Agent, M. C. March Cabrelles, abogada)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    By order of 26 May 2016 the Court of Justice (Eight Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

    Top