Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013CN0130

    Case C-130/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 18 March 2013 — Datema Hellman Worldwide Logistics BV, other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

    SL C 171, 15.6.2013, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.6.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 171/12

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 18 March 2013 — Datema Hellman Worldwide Logistics BV, other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

    (Case C-130/13)

    2013/C 171/23

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Datema Hellman Worldwide Logistics BV

    Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

    Questions referred

    1.

    Does the European law principle of respect for the rights of the defence by the authorities lend itself to direct application by the national courts?

    2.

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative:

    (a)

    must the European law principle of respect for the rights of the defence by the authorities be interpreted to mean that the principle was infringed when the addressee of an intended decision was not given a hearing before the authorities adopted a measure which adversely affected it but was given the opportunity to be heard in a subsequent (objection) phase, which precedes access to the national courts?

    (b)

    are the legal consequences of the infringement by the authorities of the European law principle of respect for the rights of the defence governed by national law?

    3.

    If the answer to question 2b is in the negative: what circumstances may the national courts take into account when determining the legal consequences, and in particular may they take into account the fact that, without the infringement by the authorities of the European law principle of respect for the rights of the defence, the proceedings would have had a different outcome?
    Top