Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TN0188

    Case T-188/08: Action brought on 13 May 2008 — Infeurope v Commission

    SL C 171, 5.7.2008, p. 48–48 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.7.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 171/48


    Action brought on 13 May 2008 — Infeurope v Commission

    (Case T-188/08)

    (2008/C 171/91)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Infeurope SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

    Form of order sought

    declare that the European Commission has failed to annul the decision of awarding the framework contracts under the call for tenders procedure AO/026/06 of the OHIM on consultancy services, audits and studies;

    declare that the European Commission has failed to terminate the specific contracts concluded under the said framework contracts;

    order the European Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 35 950 plus 4 % interest on the amount of EUR 33 050 from 19 December 2006, plus 4 % interest on the amount of EUR 2 900 from 14 December 2007; respectively 8 % interest on sum of EUR 35 950 from the date of judgment;

    order the European Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 646 631,27, plus 4 % interest on the said sum from 14 May 2008, respectively 8 % interest on the said sum from the date of judgment;

    order the European Commission to produce certain documents relating to the procedure for evaluating the tenders;

    order the European Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The applicant seeks the declaration that the Commission failed to annul the decision taken by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) awarding multiple framework contracts under the tender procedure AO/026/06 of the OHIM on ‘E-Alicante: consultancy services, audits and studies’ (1) and that it has failed to terminate the corresponding specific contracts under the framework.

    The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are identical to those raised in Case T-176/08 Infeurope v Commission.


    (1)  OJ 2006/S 210-223510.


    Top