This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008FA0009
Case F-9/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Grading — Request for reclassification — Scope of Article 13 in Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Taking into account professional experience — Recruitment in the grade of the competition — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Free movement of workers)
Case F-9/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Grading — Request for reclassification — Scope of Article 13 in Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Taking into account professional experience — Recruitment in the grade of the competition — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Free movement of workers)
Case F-9/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Grading — Request for reclassification — Scope of Article 13 in Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Taking into account professional experience — Recruitment in the grade of the competition — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Free movement of workers)
SL C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 83–84
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.11.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 267/83 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Rosenbaum v Commission
(Case F-9/08) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Appointment - Grading - Request for reclassification - Scope of Article 13 in Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Taking into account professional experience - Recruitment in the grade of the competition - Article 31 of the Staff Regulations - Principle of non-discrimination - Free movement of workers)
2009/C 267/150
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Eckehard Rosenbaum (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm and M. Bauer, Agents)
Re:
Staff case — First, annulment of the decision classifying the applicant, a successful candidate in a competition held for the purpose of drawing up a reserve list for the recruitment of administrators in Grade A7/A6, in Grade AD 6/2 and, second, an application for reclassification.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Mr Rosenbaum to bear his costs and to pay those of the Commission of the European Communities; |
3. |
Orders the Council of the European Union, intervener, to bear its own costs. |