This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CN0134
Case C-134/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof lodged on 2 April 2008 — J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j. v Hauptzollamt Bremen
Case C-134/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof lodged on 2 April 2008 — J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j. v Hauptzollamt Bremen
Case C-134/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof lodged on 2 April 2008 — J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j. v Hauptzollamt Bremen
SL C 171, 5.7.2008, p. 12–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.7.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/12 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof lodged on 2 April 2008 — J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j. v Hauptzollamt Bremen
(Case C-134/08)
(2008/C 171/21)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j.
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bremen
Question referred
Is Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2193/2003 of 8 December 2003 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America (1) to be interpreted, contrary to its wording, as meaning that products for which it can be demonstrated that they are on their way to the Community on the date of first application of the additional duties and whose destination cannot be changed are not affected by the additional duty?