Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0233

    Case T-233/13: Action brought on 23 April 2013 — Hartmann v Commission

    SL C 171, 15.6.2013, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.6.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 171/38


    Action brought on 23 April 2013 — Hartmann v Commission

    (Case T-233/13)

    2013/C 171/73

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Paul Hartmann SA (Châtenois, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul, with immediate effect, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, in so far as it adds rolls, tubes and cylinders, with the exception of those for industrial use, to the list of examples of packaging;

    Order the European Commission to pay the costs in their entirety.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-202/13 Group’Hygiène v Commission


    Top