EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CA0202
Case C-202/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2021 — Claudio Necci v European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Civil service — Former member of the contract staff — Social security — Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme (JSIS) — Article 95 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS) — Continued membership after retirement — Condition of having been employed for more than three years — Request to join the JSIS following a transfer of pension rights — Equating the credited years of pensionable service with years of service — Rejection of the request — Action for annulment — Act having an adverse effect — Order of the General Court declaring the action inadmissible — Order set aside)
Case C-202/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2021 — Claudio Necci v European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Civil service — Former member of the contract staff — Social security — Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme (JSIS) — Article 95 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS) — Continued membership after retirement — Condition of having been employed for more than three years — Request to join the JSIS following a transfer of pension rights — Equating the credited years of pensionable service with years of service — Rejection of the request — Action for annulment — Act having an adverse effect — Order of the General Court declaring the action inadmissible — Order set aside)
Case C-202/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2021 — Claudio Necci v European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Civil service — Former member of the contract staff — Social security — Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme (JSIS) — Article 95 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS) — Continued membership after retirement — Condition of having been employed for more than three years — Request to join the JSIS following a transfer of pension rights — Equating the credited years of pensionable service with years of service — Rejection of the request — Action for annulment — Act having an adverse effect — Order of the General Court declaring the action inadmissible — Order set aside)
IO C 278, 12.7.2021, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.7.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 278/22 |
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2021 — Claudio Necci v European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union
(Case C-202/20 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Former member of the contract staff - Social security - Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme (JSIS) - Article 95 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS) - Continued membership after retirement - Condition of having been employed for more than three years - Request to join the JSIS following a transfer of pension rights - Equating the credited years of pensionable service with years of service - Rejection of the request - Action for annulment - Act having an adverse effect - Order of the General Court declaring the action inadmissible - Order set aside)
(2021/C 278/30)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Claudio Necci (represented initially by S. Orlandi and T. Martin, avocats, and subsequently by S. Orlandi, avocat)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and T.S. Bohr, acting as Agents), European Parliament (represented by: J. Van Pottelberge and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 25 March 2020, Necci v Commission (T-129/19, not published, EU:T:2020:131); |
|
2. |
Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
|
3. |
Reserves the costs. |