This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0630
Case T-630/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Çolakoğlu Metalurji and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret v Commission
Case T-630/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Çolakoğlu Metalurji and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret v Commission
Case T-630/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Çolakoğlu Metalurji and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret v Commission
IO C 471, 22.11.2021, p. 60–61
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
22.11.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 471/60 |
Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Çolakoğlu Metalurji and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret v Commission
(Case T-630/21)
(2021/C 471/85)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey), Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul) (represented by: J. Cornelis and F. Graafsma, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 of 5 July 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Turkey (OJ 2021 L 238, p. 32); and |
— |
order the European Commission to pay the applicants’ costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) by making an adjustment for a (notional) commission to the export price and, more specifically,
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 2(10)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 by requiring payment of import duties for accepting a duty drawback adjustment. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment in refusing to carry out a quarterly dumping margin calculation and consequent violation of the chapeau of Article 2(10) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 2(10)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 by refusing to adjust for hedging gains and losses. |
(1) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (JO 2016 L 176, p. 21).