This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TB0257
Case T-257/20: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2020 — González Calvet v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Decision refusing to grant financial compensation to the shareholders and creditors concerned — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-257/20: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2020 — González Calvet v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Decision refusing to grant financial compensation to the shareholders and creditors concerned — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-257/20: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2020 — González Calvet v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Decision refusing to grant financial compensation to the shareholders and creditors concerned — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
IO C 19, 18.1.2021, p. 51–52
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.1.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 19/51 |
Order of the General Court of 17 November 2020 — González Calvet v SRB
(Case T-257/20) (1)
(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Decision refusing to grant financial compensation to the shareholders and creditors concerned - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 19/55)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicants: Ramón González Calvet (Barcelona, Spain) and Joan González Calvet (Barcelona) (represented by: P. Molina Bosch, lawyer)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: S. Branca, J. King, L. Forestier and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis, V. Del Pozo Espinosa De Los Monteros and L. Hesse, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of SRB Decision SRB/EES/2020/52 of 17 March 2020 determining whether compensation needs to be granted to the shareholders and creditors in respect of which the resolution actions concerning Banco Popular Español S.A. have been effected.
Operative part of the order
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain. |
|
3. |
Orders Mr Ramón González Calvet and Mr Joan González Calvet to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain. |
|
4. |
Orders Messrs González Calvet, the SRB and the Kingdom of Spain to each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain. |