Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TN0679

    Case T-679/19: Action brought on 4 October 2019 — Argyraki v Commission

    IO C 399, 25.11.2019, p. 100–100 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.11.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 399/100


    Action brought on 4 October 2019 — Argyraki v Commission

    (Case T-679/19)

    (2019/C 399/118)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Vassilia Argyraki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of 30 November 2018 taken by the PMO concerning the way in which pension rights are to be calculated, and, in general, the application of the provisions of the Staff Regulations on pension rights in respect of the applicant when she retires;

    Order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action challenging the abovementioned decision of the European Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO), the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging failure to comply with the guidance set out in Torné (judgment of 14 December 2018, Torné v Commission, T-128/17, EU:T:2018:969);

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 21 and 22 of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging unequal treatment.


    Top