Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TA0634

    Case T-634/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    IO C 399, 25.11.2019, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.11.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 399/55


    Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology)

    (Case T-634/18) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    (2019/C 399/67)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: André Geske (Lübeck, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2018 (Case R 2721/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign revolutionary air pulse technology as an EU trade mark.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Mr André Geske to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.


    Top