Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0801

Case T-801/17: Action brought on 6 December 2017 — Dermatest v EUIPO (ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de)

IO C 42, 5.2.2018, p. 42–42 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

5.2.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/42

Action brought on 6 December 2017 — Dermatest v EUIPO (ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de)

(Case T-801/17)

(2018/C 042/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ORIGINAL excellent dermatest 3-star-guarantee.de’ — Application for registration No 15 073 381

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 in Case R 524/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top