Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TN0760

    Case T-760/17: Action brought on 20 November 2017 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+)

    IO C 22, 22.1.2018, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.1.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 22/55


    Action brought on 20 November 2017 — Meesenburg Großhandel v EUIPO (Triotherm+)

    (Case T-760/17)

    (2018/C 022/72)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Meesenburg Großhandel KG (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Freiherr von Oldershausen, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the procedure before EUIPO

    Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Triotherm+’ — Application No 15 186 471

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2017 in Case R 1786/2016-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top