This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0668
Case T-668/17: Action brought on 27 September 2017 — Maico Holding v EUIPO — Eico (Eico)
Case T-668/17: Action brought on 27 September 2017 — Maico Holding v EUIPO — Eico (Eico)
Case T-668/17: Action brought on 27 September 2017 — Maico Holding v EUIPO — Eico (Eico)
IO C 382, 13.11.2017, p. 58–59
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.11.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 382/58 |
Action brought on 27 September 2017 — Maico Holding v EUIPO — Eico (Eico)
(Case T-668/17)
(2017/C 382/72)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Maico Holding GmbH (Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany) (represented by: T. Krüger and D. Deckers, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eico A/S (Brønderslev, Denmark)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU trade mark application No 13 706 726
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2017 in Case R 2089/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Set aside the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2017, No R 2089/2016-4 Eico v Maico, and the opposition decision of 26 October 2016, No B 002528654, and amend them in such a way that the appeal and the opposition are upheld in their entirety; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 42 of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) thereof. |