Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0521

    Case T-521/17: Action brought on 6 August 2017 — Hernández Díaz v SRB

    IO C 382, 13.11.2017, p. 46–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.11.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 382/46

    Action brought on 6 August 2017 — Hernández Díaz v SRB

    (Case T-521/17)

    (2017/C 382/57)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Alberto Hernández Díaz (San Martin del Rey Aurelio, Spain) (represented by: L. Hernández Cabeza, lawyer)

    Defendant: Single Resolution Board

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that that the General Court should:

    —

    Annul the resolution decision concerning the Banco Popular, on grounds of serious and irreparable irregularities that result in the invalidity of that decision, in that (i) it is based on a Deloitte report which was not independent, (ii) shareholders are subjected to much more significant losses than they would be had an arrangement with creditors been entered into and (iii) the bail-in tool was not applied.

    —

    Annul the sale of Banco Popular to the bank acquiring it for the price of EUR 1 on the ground of lack of transparency of the sale process which implies a serious violation of the principle of transparency as well as the principle of competition.

    —

    Order SRB to pay compensation to the shareholders for the compulsory transfer of their shares, the value of which cannot at present be assessed given the lack of transparency of the resolution process.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

    Top