EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0015
Case T-15/17: Action brought on 6 January 2017 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)
Case T-15/17: Action brought on 6 January 2017 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)
Case T-15/17: Action brought on 6 January 2017 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)
IO C 63, 27.2.2017, p. 43–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 63/43 |
Action brought on 6 January 2017 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)
(Case T-15/17)
(2017/C 063/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Dimitrios Mitrakos (Palaio Faliro, Greece) (represented by: D. Bakopanou, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Juan Ignacio Belasco Baquedano (Viana, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘YAMAS’ — Application for registration No 13 645 478
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 October 2016 in Case R 532/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision, as well as the decision given by the Opposition Division which preceded the adoption of the contested decision; |
|
— |
reject the opposition and allow that the registration of the trade mark applied for be registered; |
|
— |
order the EUIPO and/or the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |