Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CA0589

    Case C-589/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Spain) — Prenatal S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Import of textile products wrongly declared as originating from Jamaica — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for remission — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 — European Commission’s decision to refuse in a particular case — Validity)

    IO C 319, 23.9.2019, p. 9–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.9.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 319/9


    Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Spain) — Prenatal S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC)

    (Case C-589/17) (1)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Import of textile products wrongly declared as originating from Jamaica - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for remission - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Community Customs Code - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 - European Commission’s decision to refuse in a particular case - Validity)

    (2019/C 319/08)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Referring court

    Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Prenatal S.A.

    Defendant: Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The consideration of Commission Decision C(2008) 6317 final of 3 November 2008 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (Case REM 03/07), in the light of Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, revealed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of that decision.


    (1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.


    Top