Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TB0785

    Case T-785/16: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — BSH Electrodomesticos España v EUIPO — DKSH International (Ufesa) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Ufesa — Amicable settlement — Acquisition by the applicant of the mark applied for — No need to adjudicate)

    IO C 231, 17.7.2017, p. 25–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.7.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 231/25


    Order of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — BSH Electrodomesticos España v EUIPO — DKSH International (Ufesa)

    (Case T-785/16) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Ufesa - Amicable settlement - Acquisition by the applicant of the mark applied for - No need to adjudicate))

    (2017/C 231/32)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA (Huarte-Pamplona, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Duarte Guimarães and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: DKSH International Ltd. (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Johansson and J. Stock, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 July 2016 (Case R 1691/2015-1) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Electrodomesticos España and DKSH International.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no need to adjudicate in the action.

    2.

    BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office.

    3.

    DKSH International Ltd. shall bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.


    Top