This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0485
Case C-485/16 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2016 by Universal Protein Supplements Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2016 in Cases T-727/14 and T-728/14: UNIVERSAL PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS v EUIPO — H YOUNG HOLDINGS (ANIMAL)
Case C-485/16 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2016 by Universal Protein Supplements Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2016 in Cases T-727/14 and T-728/14: UNIVERSAL PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS v EUIPO — H YOUNG HOLDINGS (ANIMAL)
Case C-485/16 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2016 by Universal Protein Supplements Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2016 in Cases T-727/14 and T-728/14: UNIVERSAL PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS v EUIPO — H YOUNG HOLDINGS (ANIMAL)
IO C 95, 27.3.2017, p. 4–4
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/4 |
Appeal brought on 7 September 2016 by Universal Protein Supplements Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2016 in Cases T-727/14 and T-728/14: UNIVERSAL PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS v EUIPO — H YOUNG HOLDINGS (ANIMAL)
(Case C-485/16 P)
(2017/C 095/09)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. (represented by: S. Malynicz QC)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), H Young Holdings plc
By order of 31 January 2017 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.