This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0400
Case T-400/15: Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)
Case T-400/15: Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)
Case T-400/15: Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)
IO C 320, 28.9.2015, p. 35–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.9.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 320/35 |
Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)
(Case T-400/15)
(2015/C 320/52)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Ana Isabel Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto (Algés, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pita Negrão, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: University College London (London, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘CITRUS SATURDAY’ — Application for registration No 11 789 195
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 April 2015 in Case R 2109/2014-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
consider the appeal admissible; |
|
— |
declare null and void the contested decision; |
|
— |
remit the case to the Opposition Division of the Office for further prosecution. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of the Community trade mark regulations; |
|
— |
Infringement of principles of the EC law. |