EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TB0195

Case T-195/13: Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015  — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (CAMEA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CAMEA — Earlier international word mark BALEA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

IO C 65, 23.2.2015, p. 31–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

23.2.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/31


Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (CAMEA)

(Case T-195/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CAMEA - Earlier international word mark BALEA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 065/43)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: B. Beinert, O. Bludovsky and T. Strack, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Németh, P. Geroulakos and V. Melgar, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft (Szada, Hungary) (represented by: A. Krajnyák, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2013 (Case R 452/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1.

dismisses the action.

2.

orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.


Top