Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CN0487

    Case C-487/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Laimonis Treimanis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    IO C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    26.11.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 347/15


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Laimonis Treimanis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    (Case C-487/11)

    2011/C 347/23

    Language of the case: Latvian

    Referring court

    Administratīvā rajona tiesa

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Laimonis Treimanis

    Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    Question referred

    Does Article 7(1) of Regulation No 918/83 (1) preclude the owner of a private car imported into the European Union from a third country from transferring the car, for use free of charge, to a family member who has actually moved his residence from that third country to the European Union and who formed part of a household with the owner of the car in that third country before the car was imported into the European Union, where the car owner has essentially remained in the third country since the vehicle was imported?


    (1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty (OJ 1983 L 105, p. 1).


    Top