Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TN0170

    Case T-170/08: Action brought on 13 May 2008 — Commission v I.D. FOS Research

    IO C 171, 5.7.2008, p. 42–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.7.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 171/42

    Action brought on 13 May 2008 — Commission v I.D. FOS Research

    (Case T-170/08)

    (2008/C 171/81)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Parties

    Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Roels, Agents)

    Defendant: I.D. FOS Research EEIG (Mol, Belgium)

    Form of order sought

    —

    order the defendant to pay to the Commission the sum of EUR 21 599,26 together with default interest in the sum of EUR 6 375,94;

    —

    order the defendant to pay default interest of EUR 3,99 per day from 8 January 2007 until the date of full repayment of the debt;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The European Community, represented by the Commission, entered into Contract BRPR-CT-95-0099 with the defendant on 12 December 1995. The contract concerned a project on improved quality assurance and methods of grouting post-tensioned cables. The contract and the project came into being within the framework of the specific programme for research and technological development, including demonstration, in the field of industrial and materials technologies (1).

    An examination of the defendant's performance of the contract was undertaken after completion of the contract. On the basis of the results of that examination, the Commission decided to demand repayment of part of the sums paid, in accordance with the general conditions of the contract.

    (1)  Council Decision 94/571/EC of 27 July 1994 adopting a specific programme for research and technological development, including demonstration, in the field of industrial and materials technologies (1994-1998) (OJ 1994 L 222, p. 19).

    Top